Remove internal Optional usage in favor of null checks
Issue gh-7155
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Eleftheria Stein-Kousathana
parent
2c2d3b5d85
commit
2c2e8e5f24
+11
-5
@@ -71,13 +71,19 @@ final class OAuth2ClientConfiguration {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void addArgumentResolvers(List<HandlerMethodArgumentResolver> argumentResolvers) {
|
||||
if (this.clientRegistrationRepository != null && this.authorizedClientRepository != null) {
|
||||
OAuth2AuthorizedClientProvider authorizedClientProvider =
|
||||
OAuth2AuthorizedClientProviderBuilder authorizedClientProviderBuilder =
|
||||
OAuth2AuthorizedClientProviderBuilder.builder()
|
||||
.authorizationCode()
|
||||
.refreshToken()
|
||||
.clientCredentials(configurer ->
|
||||
Optional.ofNullable(this.accessTokenResponseClient).ifPresent(configurer::accessTokenResponseClient))
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
.refreshToken();
|
||||
|
||||
if (this.accessTokenResponseClient != null) {
|
||||
authorizedClientProviderBuilder.clientCredentials(configurer ->
|
||||
configurer.accessTokenResponseClient(this.accessTokenResponseClient));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
authorizedClientProviderBuilder.clientCredentials();
|
||||
}
|
||||
OAuth2AuthorizedClientProvider authorizedClientProvider = authorizedClientProviderBuilder.build();
|
||||
|
||||
DefaultOAuth2AuthorizedClientManager authorizedClientManager = new DefaultOAuth2AuthorizedClientManager(
|
||||
this.clientRegistrationRepository, this.authorizedClientRepository);
|
||||
authorizedClientManager.setAuthorizedClientProvider(authorizedClientProvider);
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-13
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ import java.util.Collections;
|
||||
import java.util.HashMap;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.Optional;
|
||||
import java.util.UUID;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Function;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Supplier;
|
||||
@@ -2665,10 +2664,10 @@ public class ServerHttpSecurity {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void configure(ServerHttpSecurity http) {
|
||||
Optional.ofNullable(this.csrfTokenRepository).ifPresent(serverCsrfTokenRepository -> {
|
||||
this.filter.setCsrfTokenRepository(serverCsrfTokenRepository);
|
||||
http.logout().addLogoutHandler(new CsrfServerLogoutHandler(serverCsrfTokenRepository));
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (this.csrfTokenRepository != null) {
|
||||
this.filter.setCsrfTokenRepository(this.csrfTokenRepository);
|
||||
http.logout().addLogoutHandler(new CsrfServerLogoutHandler(this.csrfTokenRepository));
|
||||
}
|
||||
http.addFilterAt(this.filter, SecurityWebFiltersOrder.CSRF);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3607,19 +3606,21 @@ public class ServerHttpSecurity {
|
||||
return and();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private Optional<ServerLogoutHandler> createLogoutHandler() {
|
||||
private ServerLogoutHandler createLogoutHandler() {
|
||||
if (this.logoutHandlers.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
return Optional.empty();
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
} else if (this.logoutHandlers.size() == 1) {
|
||||
return this.logoutHandlers.get(0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return new DelegatingServerLogoutHandler(this.logoutHandlers);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (this.logoutHandlers.size() == 1) {
|
||||
return Optional.of(this.logoutHandlers.get(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return Optional.of(new DelegatingServerLogoutHandler(this.logoutHandlers));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void configure(ServerHttpSecurity http) {
|
||||
createLogoutHandler().ifPresent(this.logoutWebFilter::setLogoutHandler);
|
||||
ServerLogoutHandler logoutHandler = createLogoutHandler();
|
||||
if (logoutHandler != null) {
|
||||
this.logoutWebFilter.setLogoutHandler(logoutHandler);
|
||||
}
|
||||
http.addFilterAt(this.logoutWebFilter, SecurityWebFiltersOrder.LOGOUT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user