SEC-1499: Added some Javadoc and doc on the problems of using session-fixation protection with attributes that implement HttpSessionBindingListener.
This commit is contained in:
+12
@@ -27,6 +27,18 @@ import org.springframework.security.web.WebAttributes;
|
||||
* invalidated and a new session created by calling {@link HttpServletRequest#getSession()}.
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* If concurrent session control is in use, then a <tt>SessionRegistry</tt> must be injected.
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* <h3>Issues with <tt>HttpSessionBindingListener</tt></h3>
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* The migration of existing attributes to the newly-created session may cause problems if any of the objects
|
||||
* implement the {@code HttpSessionBindingListener} interface in a way which makes assumptions about the life-cycle of
|
||||
* the object. An example is the use of Spring session-scoped beans, where the initial removal of the bean from the
|
||||
* session will cause the {@code DisposableBean} interface to be invoked, in the assumption that the bean is no longer
|
||||
* required.
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* We'd recommend that you take account of this when designing your application and do not store attributes which
|
||||
* may not function correctly when they are removed and then placed back in the session. Alternatively, you should
|
||||
* customize the {@code SessionAuthenticationStrategy} to deal with the issue in an application-specific way.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author Luke Taylor
|
||||
* @since 3.0
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user