This refactor changes it so we only include minimal data in the
system prompt which leaves us lots of tokens for specific searches
The new search command allows us to pull in settings on demand
Descriptions are include in short search results, and names only
in longer results
Also:
* In dev it is important to tell when calls are made to open ai
this adds a console log to increase awareness around token usage
* PERF: stop counting tokens so often
This changes it so we only count tokens once per response
Previously each time we heard back from open ai we would count
tokens, leading to uneeded delays
* bug fix, commands may reach in for tokenizer
* add logging to console for anthropic calls as well
* Update lib/shared/inference/openai_completions.rb
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <[email protected]>
Also adds ai_bot_enabled_personas so admins can tweak which stock
personas are enabled.
The new persona has a full listing of all site settings and is
able to get context for each setting.
This means you can ask it to search through settings for something
relevant.
Security wise there is no access to actual configuration of settings
just to the names / description and implementation.
Previously this was part of the forum helper persona however it
just clashes too much with other behaviors, isolating it makes
it far more powerful.
* sneaking this one in, user_emails is a non obvious table in our
structure.
usually one would assume users has emails so the clarifies a bit
better. plus it is a very common table to hit.
This splits out a bunch of code that used to live inside bots
into a dedicated concept called a Persona.
This allows us to start playing with multiple personas for the bot
Ships with:
artist - for making images
sql helper - for helping with data explorer
general - for everything and anything
Also includes a few fixes that make the generic LLM function implementation more robust
This command can be used to extract information about a discourse
site setting directly from source.
To operate it needs the rg binary in the container.
This fixes 2 big issues:
1. No matter how hard you try, grounding anthropic title prompt
is just too hard. This works around by only looking at the last
sentence it returns and treating as title
2. Non English locales would be stuck with "generic" title, this
ensures every bot message gets a title, using a custom field to
track
Also, slightly tunes some anthropic prompts.
Open AI support function calling, this has a very specific shape
that other LLMs have not quite adopted.
This simulates a command framework using system prompts on LLMs
that are not open AI.
Features include:
- Smart system prompt to steer the LLM
- Parameter validation (we ensure all the params are specified correctly)
This is being tested on Anthropic at the moment and intial results
are promising.
Azure requires a single HTTP endpoint per type of completion.
The settings: `ai_openai_gpt35_16k_url` and `ai_openai_gpt4_32k_url` can be
used now to configure the extra endpoints
This amends token limit which was off a bit due to function calls and fixes
a minor JS issue where we were not testing for a property
previously you would have to wait quite a while to see the prompt this implements
a very basic implementation of progress so you can see the API is working.
Also:
- Fix google progress.
- Handle the incredibly rare, zero results from google.
- Simplify command so it is less error prone
- replace invoke and attache results with a invoke
- ensure invoke can only ever be run once
- pass in all the information a command needs in constructor
- use new pattern throughout
- test invocation in isolation
- Attempt to hint reading is done by sending complete:true
- Do not include post_number in result unless it was sent in
- Rush visual feedback when a command is run (ensure we always revise)
- Include hyperlink in read command description
- Stop round tripping to GPT after image generation (speeds up images by a lot)
- Add a test for image command
This command is useful for reading a topics content. It allows us to perform
critical analysis or suggest answers.
Given 8k token limit in GPT-4 I hardcoded reading to 1500 tokens, but we can
follow up and allow larger windows on models that support more tokens.
On local testing even in this limited form this can be very useful.
* FIX: Google command was including full payload
Additionally there was no truncating happening meaning you could blow token
budget easily on a single search.
This made Google search mostly useless and it would mean that after using
Google we would revert to a clean slate which is very confusing.
* no need for nil there
The command framework had some confusing dispatching where it would dispatch
JSON blobs, this meant there was lots of parsing required in every command
The refactor handles transforming the args prior to dispatch which makes
consuming far simpler
This is also general prep to supporting some basic command framework in other
llms.
TopicQuery already provides a lot of safeguards and options for filtering topic, and enforcing permissions. It makes sense to rely on it as other plugins like discourse-assign do.
As a bonus, we now have access to the current_user while serializing these topics, so users will see things like unread posts count just like we do for the lists.
Claude 1 costs the same and is less good than Claude 2. Make use of Claude
2 in all spots ...
This also fixes streaming so it uses the far more efficient streaming protocol.
SamandMartin Brennan
Loïc Guitaut
Keegan George
Rafael dos Santos Silva
Roman Rizzi