In https://github.com/discourse/discourse-solved/pull/342 we moved solutions away from topic_custom_fields into proper tables, with the tables as the proper source of truth to a topic's solution.
The user's /my/activity/solved route uses user_actions which is not accurate, and a user has reported a bug where their solution is not reflected there (user actions are not a good representation of what a topic's solution is).
This commit introduces
- a new route to get solutions, and is mindful `hide_user_profiles_from_public` and such settings
- also mindful of PMs and private categories
- a new template that makes use of the `<UserStream>` to load posts safely and avoid reimplementation
This commit autoloads plugin files, and also extracts features into their own modules.
- `plugin.rb` is smaller
- external plugins like discourse-automation and discourse-assign have their own entrypoints
- solved filters as well
A while ago the `accept_all_solutions_allowed_groups` setting was introduced to replace the `accept_all_solutions_trust_level` setting and to make the plugin more flexible by allowing admins to choose groups that are allowed to accept solutions instead of trust levels.
The new group-based setting includes the TL4 group by default. However, removing the TL4 group from the setting doesn't actually remove TL4 users permission to accept solution.
The reason for this bug is that the `can_accept_answer?` guardian method calls `can_perform_action_available_to_group_moderators?` which always allows TL4 users to perform category moderator actions:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/56524f4bdf9d45eddf7967ccead169ec6dd6cbb8/lib/guardian/topic_guardian.rb#L342-L348
This commit fixes the bug by checking if the user is a moderator on the topic's category (by calling the `is_category_group_moderator?` guardian method) instead of checking if the user can perform category moderator actions. In our case, `is_category_group_moderator?` is equivalent to `can_perform_action_available_to_group_moderators?` except for the TL4 check which is what we need.
Internal topic: t/134675.
* FEATURE: change status on unsolve & fix assign changes
When a topic is unsolved, it should have an option,
defined in the settings, to change its status to that state.
Fix assign changes when a topic was solved, previously it was
changing the assignee.
* DEV: Change names in tests and remove comments
* DEV: Update change status on solve implementation
Update tests to verify that the change status on solve feature is working as expected.
Change the implementation to loop throught the topic assignments and update the status.
* DEV: address review feedback
* FEATURE: Prevents assign notification & change status on solved
Relates to this [topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/assign-plugin-for-informatica/256974/94)
Add an event listener to `accepted_solution` event
Add `assigns_reminder_assigned_topics_query` modifier to not notify if
`prevent_assign_notification` setting is on.
Add settings to prevent assign notification and change status on solved
* DEV: Address review comments
Update SiteSettings names.
* DEV(WIP): Add tests for integration with discourse-assign
Add test for integration with discourse-assign plugin
checks if the assignment status is moved to `Done`
* DEV: lint solved_spec.rb
* DEV: Update test where it updates all assignments
Change `on(:accepted_solution)` is defined
Update test to use acting_user instead of admin
* DEV: lint & add tests for assigns_reminder_assigned_topics_query
Linted and added tests for `assigns_reminder_assigned_topics_query` modifier.
* DEV: Update tests based on review feedback
change plugin_initializer location
update spec with new tests to test integration with discourse-assign
* DEV: Add describe to spec for discourse-assign integration tests
* DEV: update describe name for discourse-assing spec integration
* DEV: Add more tests to spec for discourse-assign integration
* DEV: Lint solved_spec
* DEV: Lint and update spec to not have `p1` topic inside
This refactor makes for easier testing and makes things
more organised, the guardian extensions had no testing
whatsoever and I need some to make the TL -> group change.
Many consumers of Discourse solved may want solved topics to show up more
prominently in search. New setting `prioritize_solved_topics_in_search` (default off) allows
bumping these topics to the top.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
* FEATURE: solved topic auto close setting per category
This commit adds per category "solved topics auto close hours" setting. The plugin would use the existing "solved topics auto close hours" setting, except if there was a setting for the relevant category in which case that would take precedence.
* minor changes per feedback
This is necessary, because seeding badges with a translated name will result in duplicate badges whenever the default locale changes. The static name solves this.
Moreover, it's not necessary to set the description during seeding. The serializer will localize the names and descriptions at runtime.
The DB migration tries to rename the existing badges by looking them up by their translated time.
Natalie Tay