When parsing for i18n messages, interpolated strings are
split into `Text` and `Placeholder` pieces. The method that
does this `_visitTextWithInterpolation()` was becoming too
complex. This commit refactors that method along with some
associated functions that it uses.
PR Close#39717
Though we currently have the knowledge of where the `key` for an
event binding appears during parsing, we do not propagate this
information to the output AST. This means that once we produce the
template AST, we have no way of mapping a template position to the key
span alone. The best we can currently do is map back to the
`sourceSpan`. This presents problems downstream, specifically for the
language service, where we cannot provide correct information about a
position in a template because the AST is not granular enough.
This is essentially identical to the change from #38898, but for event
bindings rather than input bindings.
PR Close#39609
Currently expressions `$event.foo()` and `this.$event.foo()`, as well as `$any(foo)` and
`this.$any(foo)`, are treated as the same expression by the compiler, because `this` is considered
the same implicit receiver as when the receiver is omitted. This introduces the following issues:
1. Any time something called `$any` is used, it'll be stripped away, leaving only the first parameter.
2. If something called `$event` is used anywhere in a template, it'll be preserved as `$event`,
rather than being rewritten to `ctx.$event`, causing the value to undefined at runtime. This
applies to listener, property and text bindings.
These changes resolve the first issue and part of the second one by preserving anything that
is accessed through `this`, even if it's one of the "special" ones like `$any` or `$event`.
Furthermore, these changes only expose the `$event` global variable inside event listeners,
whereas previously it was available everywhere.
Fixes#30278.
PR Close#39323
This commit handles the following cases:
- incomplete pipes in a pipe chain
- incomplete arguments in a pipe chain
- incomplete arguments provided to a pipe
- nested pipes
The idea is to unconditionally recover on the presence of a pipe, which
should be okay because expression parsing can be independently between
pipes.
PR Close#39437
There is no actionable change in this commit other than to pretty-print
EOF tokens. Actual parsing of unterminated pipes is already supported,
this just adds a test for it.
Part of #38596
PR Close#39113
Prior to this change, expressions within ICUs would have a source span
corresponding with the whole ICU. This commit narrows down the source
spans of these expressions to the exact location in the source file, as
a prerequisite for reporting type check errors within these expressions.
PR Close#39072
This patch refactors the interpolation parser to do so iteratively
rather than using a regex. Doing so prepares us for supporting granular
recovery on poorly-formed interpolations, for example when an
interpolation does not terminate (`{{ 1 + 2`) or is not terminated
properly (`{{ 1 + 2 {{ 2 + 3 }}`).
Part of #38596
PR Close#38977
This patch adds support for recovering well-formed (and near-complete)
ASTs for semantically malformed keyed reads and keyed writes. See the
added tests for details on the types of semantics we can now recover;
in particular, notice that some assumptions are made about the form of
a keyed read/write intended by a user. For example, in the malformed
expression `a[1 + = 2`, we assume that the user meant to write a binary
expression for the key of `a`, and assign that key the value `2`. In
particular, we now parse this as `a[1 + <empty expression>] = 2`. There
are some different interpretations that can be made here, but I think
this is reasonable.
The actual changes in the parser code are fairly minimal (a nice
surprise!); the biggest addition is a `writeContext` that marks whether
the `=` operator can serve as a recovery point after error detection.
Part of #38596
PR Close#39004
Though we currently have the knowledge of where the `key` for an
attribute binding appears during parsing, we do not propagate this
information to the output AST. This means that once we produce the
template AST, we have no way of mapping a template position to the key
span alone. The best we can currently do is map back to the
`sourceSpan`. This presents problems downstream, specifically for the
language service, where we cannot provide correct information about a
position in a template because the AST is not granular enough.
PR Close#38898
The expression parser will split the expression up at the interpolation markers
into expressions and static strings. This commit also captures the positions of
these strings in the expression to be used in source-mapping later.
PR Close#38645
Prior to this change, the unary + and - operators would be parsed as `x - 0`
and `0 - x` respectively. The runtime semantics of these expressions are
equivalent, however they may introduce inaccurate template type checking
errors as the literal type is lost, for example:
```ts
@Component({
template: `<button [disabled]="isAdjacent(-1)"></button>`
})
export class Example {
isAdjacent(direction: -1 | 1): boolean { return false; }
}
```
would incorrectly report a type-check error:
> error TS2345: Argument of type 'number' is not assignable to parameter
of type '-1 | 1'.
Additionally, the translated expression for the unary + operator would be
considered as arithmetic expression with an incompatible left-hand side:
> error TS2362: The left-hand side of an arithmetic operation must be of
type 'any', 'number', 'bigint' or an enum type.
To resolve this issues, the implicit transformation should be avoided.
This commit adds a new unary AST node to represent these expressions,
allowing for more accurate type-checking.
Fixes#20845Fixes#36178
PR Close#37918
Builds on top of #34655 to support more cases that could be using a pipe inside host bindings (e.g. ternary expressions or function calls).
Fixes#37610.
PR Close#37883
ASTs for property read and method calls contain information about
the entire span of the expression, including its receiver. Use cases
like a language service and compile error messages may be more
interested in the span of the direct identifier for which the
expression is constructed (i.e. an accessed property). To support this,
this commit adds a `nameSpan` property on
- `PropertyRead`s
- `SafePropertyRead`s
- `PropertyWrite`s
- `MethodCall`s
- `SafeMethodCall`s
The `nameSpan` property already existed for `BindingPipe`s.
This commit also updates usages of these expressions' `sourceSpan`s in
Ngtsc and the langauge service to use `nameSpan`s where appropriate.
PR Close#36826
This commit propagates the `sourceSpan` and `valueSpan` of a `VariableBinding`
in a microsyntax expression to `ParsedVariable`, and subsequently to
View Engine Variable AST and Ivy Variable AST.
Note that this commit does not propagate the `keySpan`, because it involves
significant changes to the template AST.
PR Close#36047
This commit adds fine-grained text spans to TemplateBinding for microsyntax expressions.
1. Source span
By convention, source span refers to the entire span of the binding,
including its key and value.
2. Key span
Span of the binding key, without any whitespace or keywords like `let`
The value span is captured by the value expression AST.
This is part of a series of PRs to fix source span mapping in microsyntax expression.
For more info, see the doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mEVF2pSSMSnOloqOPQTYNiAJO0XQxA1H0BZyESASOrE/edit?usp=sharing
PR Close#35897
TemplateAst values are currently typed as the base class AST, but they
are actually constructed with ASTWithSource. Type them as such, because
ASTWithSource gives more information about the consumed expression AST
to downstream customers (namely, the expression AST source).
Unblocks #35271
PR Close#35892
This commit removes the `NullAstVisitor` and `visitAstChildren` exported
from `packages/compiler/src/expression_parser/ast.ts` because they
contain duplicate and buggy implementation, and their use cases could be
sufficiently covered by `RecursiveAstVisitor` if the latter implements the
`visit` method. This use case is only needed in the language service.
With this change, any visitor that extends `RecursiveAstVisitor` could
just define their own `visit` function and the parent class will behave
correctly.
A bit of historical context:
In language service, we need a way to tranverse the expression AST in a
selective manner based on where the user's cursor is. This means we need a
"filtering" function to decide which node to visit and which node to not
visit. Instead of refactoring `RecursiveAstVisitor` to support this,
`visitAstChildren` was created. `visitAstChildren` duplicates the
implementation of `RecursiveAstVisitor`, but introduced some bugs along
the way. For example, in `visitKeyedWrite`, it visits
```
obj -> key -> obj
```
instead of
```
obj -> key -> value
```
Moreover, because of the following line
```
visitor.visit && visitor.visit(ast, context) || ast.visit(visitor, context);
```
`visitAstChildren` visits every node *twice*.
PR Close#35619
Pipes in host binding expressions are not supported in View Engine and Ivy, but in some more complex cases (like `(value | pipe) === true`) compiler was not reporting errors. This commit extends Ivy logic to detect pipes in host binding expressions and throw in cases bindings are present. View Engine behavior remains the same.
PR Close#34655
In the past, only the starting index of an expression Token has been
recorded, so a parser could demarkate the span of a token only by the
start locations of two tokens. This may lead to trailing whitespace
being included in the token span:
```html
{{ token1 + token2 }}
^^^^^^^^^ recorded span of `token1`
```
It's also not enough for a parser to determine the end of a token by
adding the length of the token value to the token's start location,
because lexed expression values may not exactly reflect the source code.
For example, `"d\\"e"` is lexed as a string token whose value is `d"e`.
Instead, this commit adds a `end` field to expression tokens. `end`
is one past the last index of the token source code. This will enable a
parser to determine the span of a token just by looking at that token.
This is a breaking change because the contructor interface of `Token`
has changed.
Part of #33477.
PR Close#33549
Previously, the type checker would compute an absolute source span by
combining an expression AST node's `ParseSpan` (relative to the start of
the expression) together with the absolute offset of the expression as
represented in a `ParseSourceSpan`, to arrive at a span relative to the
start of the file. This information is now directly available on an
expression AST node in the `AST.sourceSpan` property, which can be used
instead.
PR Close#34417
Expressions in an inline template binding are improperly recorded as
spaning an offset calculated from the start of the template binding
attribute key, whereas they should be calculated from the start of the
attribute value, which contains the actual binding AST.
PR Close#31813
Trotyl
Krzysztof Grzybek
Pete Bacon Darwin
Andrew Scott
Kristiyan Kostadinov
ayazhafiz
JoostK
Joey Perrott
Alex Rickabaugh
Keen Yee Liau
Keen Yee Liau
Ayaz Hafiz
Andrew Kushnir