* fix(ngRouteShim): update anchors to function similar to angular 1.x when setting the target
* fix(ngRouteShim): update anchor target check to use indexOf instead of contains on array
Make sure the same path is not added multiple times to the history.
It is replacing the state, instead of skipping it completely,
because the current path in the browser might not be normalized,
while the given one is normalized.
Closes#7829Closes#7897
If the $routerOnActivate hook returns a promise, the navigation
is commited, once the promise gets fullfilled but the view
is updated immediately.
This commit delays the view update so that both (view and url) are
updated at the same time.
Closes#7777
At the moment ng-link is generating html5mode URLs for `href`s.
Instead it should check whether or not html5mode is enabled and create
the `href`s accordingly. The renaming in the `getLink` function is
aligning it to `RouterLink`'s `_updateLink`.
Closes#7423
Until Angular 1.5.1 is released, the `$routeConfig` and `$routerCanActivate`
annotations for components must live on the controller constructor.
In Angular 1.5.1, it will automatically copy these annotations across from
the component definition file.
Closes#7319
These tests were registering new components after the application had
been bootstrapped, which is not a valid use case for synchronous routes
in Angular 1.
In particular it was registering the "root" component, which caused the
`$rootRouter` to blow up, when it was instantiated, pointing to a root
component that did not yet exist.
The directiveIntrospector was a bit of a hack to allow the router to
read the `$routeConfig` annocation and `$routerCanActivate` hook from
directives when they were registered.
It turns out that if we put these properties on the component controller's
constructor function (i.e. as static class methods) then we can simply
use the `$injector` to access it as required.
Currently, people put the properties directly on their component definition
objects. In Angular 1.5.1, we will copy these properties onto the controller
constructor to maintain a simple migration path. But going forward it may be
better to encourage people to add the properties directly to the controller
constructor.
@petebacondarwin deserves credit for most of this commit.
This allows you to specify a regex and serializer function instead
of the path DSL in your route declaration.
```
@RouteConfig([
{ regex: '[a-z]+.[0-9]+',
serializer: (params) => `{params.a}.params.b}`,
component: MyComponent }
])
class Component {}
```
Closes#7325Closes#7126
The current router is passed to the current component via a binding.
To indicate that this is an angular provided object, this commit
renames the binding to `$router`.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The recently added binding of the current router to the current component
has been renamed from `router` to `$router`.
So now the recommended set up for your bindings in your routed component
is:
```js
{
...
bindings: {
$router: '<'
}
}
```
The current router is passed to the current component via a binding.
To indicate that this is an angular provided object, this commit
renames the binding to `$router`.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The recently added binding of the current router to the current component
has been renamed from `router` to `$router`.
So now the recommended set up for your bindings in your routed component
is:
```js
{
...
bindings: {
$router: '<'
}
}
```
The singleton service that represents the top level router was called
`$router` but this is confusing since there are actually lots of routers,
which depend upon where you are in the DOM. This is similar to the situation
with scopes.
This commit clarifies this singleton by renaming it to `$rootRouter`.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `$router` injectable service has been renamed to `$rootRouter`
The current router is passed to the current component via a binding.
To indicate that this is an angular provided object, this commit
renames the binding to `$router`.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The recently added binding of the current router to the current component
has been renamed from `router` to `$router`.
So now the recommended set up for your bindings in your routed component
is:
```js
{
...
bindings: {
$router: '<'
}
}
```