This commit enhances the `CompileFn`, which is used to process each
entry-point, to support running a passed-in callback (and wait for it to
complete) before proceeding with writing the transformed files to disk.
This functionality is currently not used. In a subsequent commit, it
will be used for passing info from worker processes to the master
process that will allow ngcc to recover when a worker process crashes in
the middle of processing a task.
PR Close#36626
Rename the `markTaskCompleted()` method to be consistent with the other
similar methods of `TaskQueue` (`markAsFailed()` and
`markAsUnprocessed()`).
PR Close#36626
This commit adds support for stopping processing an in-progress task
and moving it back to the list of pending tasks.
In a subsequent commit, this will be used to allow ngcc to recover when
a worker process crashes in the middle of processing a task.
PR Close#36626
Previously, the "Compiling <entryPoint>" log message was printed before
starting to analyze and transform files, but after creating the
`EntryPointBundle` (which includes creating the TS program).
Since creating the `EntryPointBundle` involves some work, it is more
accurate to move the log message before creating the bundle.
PR Close#36626
The cached file-system was implemented to speed up ngcc
processing, but in reality most files are not accessed many times
and there is no noticeable degradation in speed by removing it.
Benchmarking `ngcc -l debug` for AIO on a local machine
gave a range of 196-236 seconds with the cache and 197-224
seconds without the cache.
Moreover, when running in parallel mode, ngcc has a separate
file cache for each process. This results in excess memory usage.
Notably the master process, which only does analysis of entry-points
holds on to up to 500Mb for AIO when using the cache compared to
only around 30Mb when not using the cache.
Finally, the file-system cache being incorrectly primed with file
contents before being processed has been the cause of a number
of bugs. For example https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/16860#issuecomment-614694269.
PR Close#36687
The current ngcc lock-file strategy spawns a new process in order to
capture a potential `SIGINT` and remove the lock-file. For more
information see #35861.
Previously, this unlocker process was spawned as soon as the `LockFile`
was instantiated in order to have it available as soon as possible
(given that spawning a process is an asynchronous operation). Since the
`LockFile` was instantiated and passed to the `Executor`, this meant
that an unlocker process was spawned for each cluster worker, when
running ngcc in parallel mode. These processes were not needed, since
the `LockFile` was not used in cluster workers, but we still had to pay
the overhead of each process' own memory and V8 instance.
(NOTE: This overhead was small compared to the memory consumed by ngcc's
normal operations, but still unnecessary.)
This commit avoids the extra processes by only spawning an unlocker
process when running on the cluster master process and not on worker
processes.
PR Close#36569
Previously, when an entry-point contained code that caused its compilation
to fail, ngcc would exit in the middle of processing, possibly leaving other
entry-points in a corrupt state.
This change adds a new `errorOnFailedEntryPoint` option to `mainNgcc` that
specifies whether ngcc should exit immediately or log an error and continue
processing other entry-points.
The default is `false` so that ngcc will not error but continue processing
as much as possible. This is useful in post-install hooks, and async CLI
integration, where we do not have as much control over which entry-points
should be processed.
The option is forced to true if the `targetEntryPointPath` is provided,
such as the sync integration with the CLI, since in that case it is targeting
an entry-point that will actually be used in the current project so we do want
ngcc to exit with an error at that point.
PR Close#36083
Later when we implement the ability to continue processing when tasks have
failed to compile, we will also need to avoid processing tasks that depend
upon the failed task.
This refactoring exposes this list of dependent tasks in a way that can be
used to skip processing of tasks that depend upon a failed task.
It also changes the blocking model of the parallel mode of operation so
that non-typings tasks are now blocked on their corresponding typings task.
Previously the non-typings tasks could be triggered to run in parallel to
the typings task, since they do not have a hard dependency on each other,
but this made it difficult to skip task correctly if the typings task failed,
since it was possible that a non-typings task was already in flight when
the typings task failed. The result of this is a small potential degradation
of performance in async parallel processing mode, in the rare cases that
there were not enough unblocked tasks to make use of all the available
workers.
PR Close#36083
Moving the definition of the `onTaskCompleted` callback into `mainNgcc()`
allows it to be configured based on options passed in there more easily.
This will be the case when we want to configure whether to log or throw
an error for tasks that failed to be processed successfully.
This commit also creates two new folders and moves the code around a bit
to make it easier to navigate the code§:
* `execution/tasks`: specific helpers such as task completion handlers
* `execution/tasks/queues`: the `TaskQueue` implementations and helpers
PR Close#36083
The previous implementation mixed up the management
of locking a piece of code (both sync and async) with the
management of writing and removing the lockFile that is
used as the flag for which process has locked the code.
This change splits these two concepts up. Apart from
avoiding the awkward base class it allows the `LockFile`
implementation to be replaced cleanly.
PR Close#35861
With this change we spawn workers lazily based on the amount of work that needs to be done.
Before this change we spawned the maximum of workers possible. However, in some cases there are less tasks than the max number of workers which resulted in created unnecessary workers
Reference: #35717
PR Close#35719
ngcc uses a lockfile to prevent two ngcc instances from executing at the
same time. Previously, if a lockfile was found the current process would
error and exit.
Now, when in async mode, the current process is able to wait for the previous
process to release the lockfile before continuing itself.
PR Close#35131
The message now gives concrete advice to developers who
experience the error due to running multiple simultaneous builds
via webpack.
Fixes#35000
PR Close#35001
Ngcc adds properties to the `package.json` files of the entry-points it
processes to mark them as processed for a format and point to the
created Ivy entry-points (in case of `--create-ivy-entry-points`). When
running ngcc in parallel mode (which is the default for the standalone
ngcc command), multiple formats can be processed simultaneously for the
same entry-point and the order of completion is not deterministic.
Previously, ngcc would append new properties at the end of the target
object in `package.json` as soon as the format processing was completed.
As a result, the order of properties in the resulting `package.json`
(when processing multiple formats for an entry-point in parallel) was
not deterministic. For tools that use file hashes for caching purposes
(such as Bazel), this lead to a high probability of cache misses.
This commit fixes the problem by ensuring that the position of
properties added to `package.json` files is deterministic and
independent of the order in which each format is processed.
Jira issue: [FW-1801](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-1801)
Fixes#34635
PR Close#34870
Previously, it was possible for multiple instance of ngcc to be running
at the same time, but this is not supported and can cause confusing and
flakey errors at build time.
Now, only one instance of ngcc can run at a time. If a second instance
tries to execute it fails with an appropriate error message.
See https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/32431#issuecomment-571825781
PR Close#34722
This gives an overview of how much time is spent in each operation/phase
and makes it easy to do rough comparisons of how different
configurations or changes affect performance.
PR Close#32427
George Kalpakas
Pete Bacon Darwin
Alan Agius