In 420b9be1c1 all style-based sanitization code was
disabled because modern browsers no longer allow for javascript expressions within
CSS. This patch is a follow-up patch which removes all traces of style sanitization
code (both instructions and runtime logic) for the `[style]` and `[style.prop]` bindings.
PR Close#36965
The message can be improved by removing the unneeded ‘the’ (x2).
Before:
Angular is running in the development mode. Call enableProdMode() to enable the production mode.
After:
Angular is running in development mode. Call enableProdMode() to enable production mode.
Closes#36570
PR Close#36571
Prior to this change, the `template` instruction logic was located in the `instructions/container.ts` file alongside embedded view instructions. Since unused embedded view instructions are removed in a previous commit, this commit renames `container.ts` -> `template.ts`, since only template-related instructions were retained.
PR Close#34715
Enables the `ng update` migrations for v10. Status for individual
migrations:
**undecorated-classes-with-di**.
This migration dealt exlusively with inherited constructors and
cases where a derived component was undecorated. In those cases,
the migration added `@Directive()` or copied the inherited decorator
to the derived class.
We don't need to run this migration again because ngtsc throws if
constructor is inherited from an undecorated class. Also ngtsc will
throw if a NgModule references an undecorated class in the declarations.
***undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields***
This migration exclusively deals with undecorated classes that use
Angular features but are not decorated. Angular features include
the use of lifecycle hooks or class fields with Angular decorators,
such as `@Input()`.
We want to re-run this migration in v10 as we will disable the
compatibility code in ngtsc that detects such undecorated classes
as `@Directive`.
**module-with-providers**:
This migration adds an explicit generic type to `ModuleWithProviders`.
As of v10, the generic type is required, so we need to re-run the
migration again.
**renderer-to-renderer2**:
We don't need to re-run that migration again as the
renderer has been already removed in v9.
**missing-injectable**:
This migration is exclusively concerned with undecorated
providers referenced in an `NgModule`. We should re-run
that migration again as we don't have proper backsliding
prevention for this yet. We can consider adding an error
in ngtsc for v10, or v11. In either way, we should re-run
the migration.
**dynamic-queries**:
We ran this one in v9 to reduce code complexity in projects. Instead
of explicitly passing `static: false`, not passing any object literal
has the same semantics. We don't need to re-run the migration again
since there is no good way to prevent backsliding and we cannot always
run this migration for future versions (as some apps might actually
intentionally use the explicit `static: false` option).
PR Close#36921
As of v10, undecorated classes using Angular features are no longer
supported. In v10, we plan on removing the undecorated classes
compatibility code in ngtsc. This means that old patterns for
undecorated classes will result in compilation errors.
We had a migration for this in v9 already, but it looks like
the migration does not handle cases where classes uses lifecycle
hooks. This is handled in the ngtsc compatibility code, and we
should handle it similarly in migrations too.
This has not been outlined in the migration plan initially,
but an appendix has been added for v10 to the plan document.
https://hackmd.io/vuQfavzfRG6KUCtU7oK_EA?both.
Note: The migration is unable to determine whether a given undecorated
class that only defines `ngOnDestroy` is a directive or an actual
service. This means that in some cases the migration cannot do
more than adding a TODO and printing an failure.
Certainly there are more ways to determine the type of such classes,
but it would involve metadata and NgModule analysis. This is out of
scope for this migration.
PR Close#36921
In v9, we deprecated the use of ModuleWithProviders
without a generic. In v10, we will be requiring the
generic when using ModuleWithProviders. You can read
more about the reasoning behind this change in the
migration guide:
http://v9.angular.io/guide/migration-module-with-providers
PR Close#36892
This patch is the first of many commits to disable sanitization for
[stlye.prop] and [style] bindings in Angular.
Historically, style-based sanitization has only been required for old
IE browsers (IE6 and IE7). Since Angular does not support these old
browsers at all, there is no reason for the framework to support
style-based sanitization.
PR Close#35621
We can remove all of the entry point resolution configuration from the package.json
in our source code as ng_package rule adds the properties automatically and correctly
configures them.
This change simplifies our code base but doesn't have any impact on the package.json
in the distributed npm_packages.
PR Close#36944
The purpose of the `WrappedValue` is to allow same object instance to be treated as different for the purposes of change detection. It is currently used with `async` pipe and only with `Observables`. The use case which it covers is if the `Observable` produces the same instance of the value but it is desirable to still try to mark it as changed for the purposes of change detection.
We believe tha the above use case is too rare to warrant special handling in the framework. (Having special handling causes application slowdown for the users and mental load for the developers.) No replacement is planned for this deprecation.
PR Close#36819
This commit fixes 2 separate issues related to root nodes retrieval from
embedded views with `<ng-content>`:
1) we did not account for the case where there were no projectable nodes
for a given `<ng-content>`;
2) we did not account for the case where projectable nodes for a given
`<ng-content>` were represented as an array of native nodes (happens in
the case of dynamically created components with projectable nodes);
Fixes#35967
PR Close#36051
Previously we were passing a string form of the value to pluralize
to the `getLocalePluralCase()` function that is extracted from the
locale data. But some locales have functions that rely upon this
value being a number not a string.
Now we convert the value to a number before passing it to the
locale data function.
Fixes#36888
PR Close#36901
Changes the Ivy unknown element/property messages from being logged with `console.warn` to `console.error`. This should make them a bit more visible without breaking existing apps. Furthermore, a lot of folks filter out warning messages in the dev tools' console, whereas errors are usually still shown.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Warnings about unknown elements are now logged as errors. This won't break your app, but it may trip up tools that expect nothing to be logged via `console.error`.
Fixes#35699.
PR Close#36399
Only refresh transplanted views at the insertion location in Ivy.
Previously, Ivy would check transplanted views at both the insertion and
declaration points. This is achieved by adding a marker to the insertion
tree when we encounter a transplanted view that needs to be refreshed at
its declaration. We use this marker as an extra indication that we still
need to descend and refresh those transplanted views at their insertion
locations even if the insertion view and/or its parents are not dirty.
This change fixes several issues:
* Transplanted views refreshed twice if both insertion and declaration
are dirty. This could be an error if the insertion component changes
result in data not being available to the transplanted view because it
is slated to be removed.
* CheckAlways transplanted views not refreshed if shielded by
non-dirty OnPush (fixes#35400)
* Transplanted views still refreshed when insertion tree is detached
(fixes#21324)
PR Close#35968
If there's an error during the first creation pass of a `TView`, the data structure may be corrupted which will cause framework assertion failures downstream which can mask the user's error. These changes add a new flag to the `TView` that indicates whether the first creation pass was successful, and if it wasn't we try re-create the `TView`.
Fixes#31221.
PR Close#36381
Prior to this change, animations-related runtime logic assumed that the @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic (animations) props are used for Components only. However having @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic props on Directives is also supported by View Engine. This commit updates the logic to select correct renderer to execute instructions (current renderer for Directives and sub-component renderer for Components).
This PR resolves#35501.
PR Close#35568
When module overrides (via `TestBed.overrideModule`) are present, it might affect all modules that import (even transitively) an overridden one. For all affected modules we need to recalculate their scopes for a given test run and restore original scopes at the end. Prior to this change, we were recalculating module scopes only for components that are used in a test, without taking into account module hierarchy. This commit updates Ivy TestBed logic to calculate all potentially affected modules are reset cached scopes information for them (so that scopes are recalculated as needed).
Resolves#36619.
PR Close#36649
Prior to this commit unbound attributes were treated as possible inputs to structural directives. Since structural directives can only accepts inputs defined using microsyntax expression (e.g. `<div *dir="exp">`), such unbound attributes should not be considered as inputs. This commit aligns Ivy and View Engine behavior and avoids using unbound attributes as inputs to structural directives.
PR Close#36441
Based on the migration guide, provided classes which don't have
either `@Injectable`, `@Directive`, `@Component` or `@Pipe` need
to be migrated.
This is not correct as provided classes with an `@NgModule` also
have a factory function that can be read by the r3 injector. It's
unclear in which cases the `@NgModule` decorator is used for
provided classes, but this scenario has been reported.
Either we fix this in the migration, or we make sure to report
this as unsupported in the Ivy compiler.
Fixes#35700.
PR Close#36369
The flag that determines whether something should be able to inject from `viewProviders` is opt-out and the pipes weren't opted out, resulting in them being able to see the viewProviders if they're placed on a component host node.
Fixes#36146.
PR Close#36512
Prior to this commit, the unknown property check was unnecessarily invoked for AOT-compiled components (for these components, the check happens at compile time). This commit updates the code to avoid unknown property verification for AOT-compiled components by checking whether schemas information is present (as a way to detect whether this is JIT or AOT compiled component).
Resolves#35945.
PR Close#36072
Prior to this change, there was a problem while matching template attributes, which mistakenly took i18n attributes (that might be present in attrs array after template ones) into account. This commit updates the logic to avoid template attribute matching logic from entering the i18n section and as a result this also allows generating proper i18n attributes sections instead of keeping these attribute in plain form (with their values) in attribute arrays.
PR Close#36422
In certain use-cases it's useful to have an ability to use empty strings as translations. Currently Ivy fails at runtime if empty string is used as a translation, since some parts of internal data structures are not created properly. This commit updates runtime i18n logic to handle empty translations and avoid unnecessary extra processing for such cases.
Fixes#36476.
PR Close#36499
The undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields migration relies on
the type checker to resolve base classes of individual classes.
It could happen that resolved base classes have no value declaration.
e.g. if they are declared through an interface in the default types.
Currently the migration will throw in such situations because it assumes
that `ts.Symbol#valueDeclaration` is always present. This is not the
case, but we don't get good type-checking here due to a bug in the
TypeScript types. See:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/24706.
Fixes#36522.
PR Close#36543
1. update jasmine to 3.5
2. update @types/jasmine to 3.5
3. update @types/jasminewd2 to 2.0.8
Also fix several cases, the new jasmine 3 will help to create test cases correctly,
such as in the `jasmine 2.x` version, the following case will pass
```
expect(1 == 2);
```
But in jsamine 3, the case will need to be
```
expect(1 == 2).toBeTrue();
```
PR Close#34625
Currently destroy hooks are stored in memory as `[1, hook, 5, hook]` where
the numbers represent the index at which to find the context and `hook` is
the function to be invoked. This breaks down for `multi` providers,
because the value at the index will be an array of providers, resulting in
the hook being invoked with an array of all the multi provider values,
rather than the provider that was destroyed. In ViewEngine `ngOnDestroy`
wasn't being called for `multi` providers at all.
These changes fix the issue by changing the structure of the destroy hooks to `[1, hook, 5, [0, hook, 3, hook]]` where the indexes inside the inner array point to the provider inside of the multi provider array. Note that this is slightly different from the original design which called for the structure to be `[1, hook, 5, [hook, hook]`, because in the process of implementing it, I realized that we wouldn't get passing the correct context if only some of the `multi` providers have `ngOnDestroy` and others don't.
I've run the newly-added `view_destroy_hooks` benchmark against these changes and compared it to master. The difference seems to be insignificant (between 1% and 2% slower).
Fixes#35231.
PR Close#35840
In rare cases a project with configured `rootDirs` that has imports to
non-existent identifiers could fail in the migration.
This happens because based on the application code, the migration could
end up trying to resolve the `ts.Symbol` of such non-existent
identifiers. This isn't a problem usually, but due to a upstream bug
in the TypeScript compiler, a runtime error is thrown.
This is because TypeScript is unable to compute a relative path from the
originating source file to the imported source file which _should_
provide the non-existent identifier. An issue for this has been reported
upstream: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/37731. The
issue only surfaces since our migrations don't provide an absolute base
path that is used for resolving the root directories.
To fix this, we ensure that we never use relative paths when parsing
tsconfig files. More details can be found in the TS issue.
Fixes#36346.
PR Close#36367
Matias Niemelä
Michiel Kikkert
Andrew Kushnir
Paul Gschwendtner
Kara Erickson
Igor Minar
Misko Hevery
Pawel Kozlowski
Pete Bacon Darwin
crisbeto
Andrew Scott
Joey Perrott
JiaLiPassion
Wagner Maciel