* it's tricky to get out of the runfiles tree with `bazel test` as `BUILD_WORKSPACE_DIRECTORY` is not set but I employed a trick to read the `DO_NOT_BUILD_HERE` file that is one level up from `execroot` and that contains the workspace directory. This is experimental and if `bazel test //:test.debug` fails than `bazel run` is still guaranteed to work as `BUILD_WORKSPACE_DIRECTORY` will be set in that context
* test //integration:bazel_test and //integration:bazel-schematics_test exclusively
* run "exclusive" and "manual" bazel-in-bazel integration tests in their own CI job as they take 8m+ to execute
```
//integration:bazel-schematics_test PASSED in 317.2s
//integration:bazel_test PASSED in 167.8s
```
* Skip all integration tests that are now handled by angular_integration_test except the tests that are tracked for payload size; these are:
- cli-hello-world*
- hello_world__closure
* add & pin @babel deps as newer versions of babel break //packages/localize/src/tools/test:test
@babel/core dep had to be pinned to 7.6.4 or else //packages/localize/src/tools/test:test failed. Also //packages/localize uses @babel/generator, @babel/template, @babel/traverse & @babel/types so these deps were added to package.json as they were not being hoisted anymore from @babel/core transitive.
NB: integration/hello_world__systemjs_umd test must run with systemjs 0.20.0
NB: systemjs must be at 0.18.10 for legacy saucelabs job to pass
NB: With Bazel 2.0, the glob for the files to test `"integration/bazel/**"` is empty if integation/bazel is in .bazelignore. This glob worked under these conditions with 1.1.0. I did not bother testing with 1.2.x as not having integration/bazel in .bazelignore is correct.
PR Close#33927
Verify that all files in the repo are covered by the pullapprove config
and that all rules in the pullapprove config match at least one file
in the repo.
PR Close#35060
In the past we had connecitivity issues on Saucelabs. Browsers on
mobile devices were not able to properly resolve the `localhost`
hostname through the tunnel. This is because the device resolves
`localhost` or `127.0.0.1` to the actual Saucelabs device, while it
should resolve to the tunnel host machine (in our case the CircleCI VM).
In the past, we simply disabled the failing devices and re-enabled the
devices later. At this point, the Saucelabs team claimed that the
connecitivy/proxy issues were fixed.
Saucelabs seems to have a process for VMs which ensures that requests to
`localhost` / `127.0.0.1` are properly resolved through the tunnel. This
process is not very reliable and can cause tests to fail. Related issues have been
observed/mentioned in the Saucelabs support docs. e.g.
https://support.saucelabs.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002212447-Unable-to-Reach-Application-on-localhost-for-Tests-Run-on-Safari-8-and-9-and-Edgehttps://support.saucelabs.com/hc/en-us/articles/225106887-Safari-and-Internet-Explorer-Won-t-Load-Website-When-Using-Sauce-Connect-on-Localhost
In order to ensure that requests are always resolved through the tunnel,
we add our own domain alias in the CircleCI's hosts file, and enforce that
it is always resolved through the tunnel (using the `--tunnel-domains` SC flag).
Saucelabs devices by default will never resolve this domain/hostname to the
actual local Saucelabs device.
PR Close#35171
Previously we needed the `components-repo-ci` blocklist to disable
tests that were failing during the development of Ivy. Since we fixed
all those failing tests, and we don't want to regress, we can remove the
blocklist logic.
Resolves FW-1807
PR Close#35115
the commit causes lint on upstream/master to fail. We need to fix the script to not check too many past commits, but that
will have to wait until a follow up PR.
PR Close#35017
* Added a /tools/saucelabs/sauce-service.sh script that manages the sauce-connect as a service which is used by the karma-saucelabs.js wrapper to start the service.
* Added /tools/saucelabs/README.md that covers the details of SauceLabs karma testing with Bazel.
PR Close#34769
We are migrating to PullApprove for our PR review management in an attempt
to allow for more granular and equitable code review assignments across the
team. Currently this migration is equivalent in the review assignments
it will create. Once stable, our expectation is that we will be able to
take advantage of PullApproves additional features for things like staged
reviews.
PR Close#34814
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
This change reverts https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/28711
NOTE: This change deletes code and creates a BROKEN SHA. If reverting this SHA needs to be reverted with the next SHA to get back into a valid state.
The change removes the fact that `NgStyle`/`NgClass` is special and colaborates with the `[style]`/`[class]` to merge its styles. By reverting to old behavior we have better backwards compatiblity since it is no longer treated special and simply overwrites the styles (same as VE)
PR Close#34616
Greg Magolan
JiaLiPassion
Miško Hevery
Joey Perrott
Paul Gschwendtner
Igor Minar
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Adam