Commit Graph
479 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Pawel Kozlowski e9bedc63bb fix(ivy): properly query root nodes of embedded views(shallow queries) (#28560)
PR Close #28560
2019-02-08 16:42:45 -08:00
Olivier Combe 9d109929be fix(ivy): remove nested placeholders with i18n (#28595)
PR Close #28595
2019-02-07 16:56:36 -08:00
Kara Erickson 1950e2d9ba fix(ivy): throw on bindings to unknown properties (#28537)
This commit adds a devMode-only check which will throw if a user
attempts to bind a property that does not match a directive
input or a known HTML property.

Example:
```
<div [unknownProp]="someValue"></div>
```

The above will throw because "unknownProp" is not a known
property of HTMLDivElement.

This check is similar to the check executed in View Engine during
template parsing, but occurs at runtime instead of compile-time.

Note: This change uncovered an existing bug with host binding
inheritance, so some Material tests had to be turned off. They
will be fixed in an upcoming PR.

PR Close #28537
2019-02-07 12:37:32 -08:00
Andrew Kushnir 7660d0d74a fix(ivy): extended next pointer lookup while traversing tNode tree (#28533)
Prior to this change we only checked whether current lView has a next pointer while traversing tNode tree. However in some cases this pointer can be undefined and we need to look up parents chain to find suitable next pointer. This commit adds the logic of searching for the next pointer taking parents chain into account.

PR Close #28533
2019-02-07 12:37:13 -08:00
Miško Hevery 62a13e795a refactor(ivy): pass host into createLView explicitly (#28461)
`LView` `HOST` was set in most cases right after creating `LView`.
This makes the API cleaner by explicitly passing it ont `createLView`.

PR Close #28461
2019-02-06 00:24:24 -05:00
Kara Erickson 8f15cdbc7c test(ivy): move some local ref tests to use TestBed infrastructure. (#28534)
When we first started writing tests for Ivy, we did not yet have a
compatible compiler. For this reason, we set up the Ivy runtime tests
to run with generated code that we wrote by hand (instead of real code
generated by the compiler).

Now that we have a working Ivy compiler and TestBed infrastructure
that is compatible with Ivy, we should start writing integration
tests that leverage them (no more handwritten generated code!). This
will prevent bugs where the compiler code and runtime code become
out of sync (which is easy if they are tested separately). And
eventually, we should migrate all the existing runtime tests in
"core/test/render3" to TestBed and ngtsc.

To kick off this effort, this commit migrates some existing tests
from "core/test/render3/exports_spec.ts" and saves them in a new file
with the same name in the "core/test/acceptance" folder.

PR Close #28534
2019-02-05 23:31:08 -05:00
Olivier Combe baf103c98f fix(ivy): don't increment expandoStartIndex after directives are matched (#28424)
i18n instructions create text nodes dynamically and save them between bindings and the expando block in `LView`. e.g., they try to create the following order in `LView`.

```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando (dirs, injectors) -- |
```

Each time a new text node is created, it is pushed to the end of the array and the `expandoStartIndex` marker is incremented, so the section begins slightly later. This happens in `allocExpando`.

This is fine if no directives have been created yet. The end of the array will be in the "dynamic text node" section.

| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- |

However, this approach doesn't work if dynamic text nodes are created after directives are matched (for example when the directive uses host bindings). In that case, there are already directives and injectors saved in the "expando" section. So pushing to the end of `LView` actually pushes after the expando section. What we get is this:

```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando -- | -- dynamic i18n text-- |
```

In this case, the `expandoStartIndex` shouldn't be incremented because we are not inserting anything before the expando section (it's now after the expando section). But because it is incremented in the code right now, it's now pointing to an index in the middle of the expando section.

This PR fixes that so that we only increment the `expandoStartIndex` if nothing was pushed into the expando section.

FW-978 #resolve

PR Close #28424
2019-02-05 23:30:37 -05:00
Jeremy Elbourn 89eac702b5 fix(ivy): remove DOM nodes from their real parent vs saved parent (#28455)
Currently, DOM node removal called `removeChild` on the saved parent
node when destroying a component. However, this will fail if the
component has been manually moved in the DOM. This change makes the
removal always use the node's real `parentNode` and ignore the provided
`parent`.

PR Close #28455
2019-02-05 23:29:24 -05:00
Kara Erickson f2621dbb37 fix(core): remove createInjector() from public API (#28509)
createInjector() is an Ivy-only API that should not have
been exported as part of the public API. This commit removes
the export. It will be re-exported when Ivy is released.

PR Close #28509
2019-02-04 16:54:26 -05:00
Kara Erickson 5c4d95541e fix(ivy): mark views dirty by default when events fire (#28474)
In Ivy, we support a new manual mode that allows for stricter control
over change detection in OnPush components. Specifically, in this mode,
events do not automatically mark OnPush views as dirty. Only changed
inputs and manual calls to `markDirty()` actually mark a view dirty.

However, this mode cannot be the default for OnPush components if we
want to be backwards compatible with View Engine. This commit re-adds
the legacy logic for OnPush components where events always mark views
dirty and makes it the default behavior.

Note: It is still TODO to add a public API for manual change detection.

PR Close #28474
2019-02-01 15:48:06 -05:00
Jeremy Elbourn 35e45dc894 fix(ivy): prevent errors from views being destroyed twice (#28413)
Previously, attempting to destroy a view with listeners more than once
throws an error during event listener cleanup. This happens because
`cleanup` field on the `TView` has already been cleared out by the time
the second destruction runs.

The `destroyed` flag on LView was previously being set in the `destroyLView` function,
but this flag was never _checked_ anywhere in the codebase. This commit
moves _setting_ this flag to the `cleanupView` function, just before
destroy hooks are called. This is necessary because the destroy hooks
can contain arbitrary user code, such as (surprise!) attempting to
destroy the view (again). We also add a check to `destroyLView` to skip
already-destroyed views. This prevents the cleanup code path from running twice.

PR Close #28413
2019-01-30 20:39:55 -05:00
onlyflix 41e68f7a7a style: change to American English (#27266)
PR Close #27266
2019-01-29 16:30:25 -08:00
Jeremy Elbourn 2bb518c694 fix(ivy): add root components to the root view tree in renderComponent (#28409)
Previously, these components were not added to the view tree for the
(fake) root view in which they were bootstrapped. Without this,
root view destruction does not work as expected since the root view's
children are not present to be also destroyed.

PR Close #28409
2019-01-29 11:49:29 -08:00
Andrew Kushnir f38deb0f07 fix(ivy): update test after Content Queries inheritance fix (#28414)
This commit updates test that was added after Content Queries inheritance fix (that renames some instructions) was merged into master. The test used previous version of instructions, thus causing failures after merging Content Queries inheritance fix.

PR Close #28414
2019-01-28 22:07:32 -08:00
Andrew Kushnir bb94434d85 fix(ivy): Content Queries inheritance fix (#28324)
Prior to this change contentQueriesRefresh functions that represent refresh logic for @ContentQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Directive inherits another one and both of them contain Content Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries in refresh function, results were placed into wrong Queries. In order to avoid that we no longer use indices to reference queries and instead maintain current content query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose contentQueriesRefresh functions and make inheritance feature work with Content Queries.

PR Close #28324
2019-01-28 19:59:00 -08:00
Alex Rickabaugh 7d954dffd0 feat(ivy): detect cycles and use remote scoping of components if needed (#28169)
By its nature, Ivy alters the import graph of a TS program, adding imports
where template dependencies exist. For example, if ComponentA uses PipeB
in its template, Ivy will insert an import of PipeB into the file in which
ComponentA is declared.

Any insertion of an import into a program has the potential to introduce a
cycle into the import graph. If for some reason the file in which PipeB is
declared imports the file in which ComponentA is declared (maybe it makes
use of a service or utility function that happens to be in the same file as
ComponentA) then this could create an import cycle. This turns out to
happen quite regularly in larger Angular codebases.

TypeScript and the Ivy runtime have no issues with such cycles. However,
other tools are not so accepting. In particular the Closure Compiler is
very anti-cycle.

To mitigate this problem, it's necessary to detect when the insertion of
an import would create a cycle. ngtsc can then use a different strategy,
known as "remote scoping", instead of directly writing a reference from
one component to another. Under remote scoping, a function
'setComponentScope' is called after the declaration of the component's
module, which does not require the addition of new imports.

FW-647 #resolve

PR Close #28169
2019-01-28 12:10:25 -08:00
Marc Laval d83307adab fix(ivy): init hooks should be called once and only once (#28239)
PR Close #28239
2019-01-25 14:31:23 -08:00
Marc Laval 873750609f fix(ivy): calling ChangeDetectorRef.detectChanges() from onChanges should not go infinite loop (#28239)
PR Close #28239
2019-01-25 14:31:23 -08:00
Miško Hevery 3d5a919ac5 refactor(ivy): clean up TNode not depending on LView (#28354)
PR Close #28354
2019-01-25 13:07:26 -08:00
Andrew Kushnir 2da82db3bc fix(ivy): proper i18n postprocessing in case of nested templates (#28209)
Prior to this change the postprocess step relied on the order of placeholders combined in one group (e.g. [�#1�|�*1:1�]). The order is not guaranteed in case we have nested templates (since we use BFS to process templates) and some tags are represented using same placeholders. This change performs postprocessing more accurate by keeping track of currently active template and searching for matching placeholder.

PR Close #28209
2019-01-25 12:54:29 -08:00
Marc Laval fdc2b0bf77 fix(ivy): queries should register matches from top to bottom (#28319)
PR Close #28319
2019-01-25 12:51:09 -08:00
Kara Erickson c1fb9c265c fix(ivy): save queries at the correct indices (#28327)
Previous to this change, we were storing view queries at the
wrong index. This is because we were passing a raw index to the
store() instruction instead of an adjusted index (i.e. an
index that does not include the HEADER_OFFSET). We had an
additional issue where TView.blueprint was not backfilled
when TView.data was backfilled, so new component instances
created from the blueprint would end up having a shorter LView.
Both of these problems together led to the Material demo app
failing with Ivy. This commit fixes those discrepancies.

PR Close #28327
2019-01-24 10:16:22 -08:00
Andrew Kushnir 9098225ff0 fix(ivy): View Queries inheritance fix (#28309)
Prior to this change `viewQuery` functions that represent @ViewQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Component/Directive inherits another one and both of them contain View Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries, resulting query set was corrupted (child component queries were overridden by super class ones). In order to avoid that we no longer use indices assigned at compile time and instead maintain current view query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose `viewQuery` functions and make inheritance feature work with View Queries.

PR Close #28309
2019-01-23 14:57:17 -08:00
Kristiyan Kostadinov 9f9024b7a1 fix(ivy): handle namespaces in attributes (#28242)
Adds handling for namespaced attributes when generating the template and in the `elementAttribute` instruction.

PR Close #28242
2019-01-23 11:58:41 -08:00
Ben Lesh 5430d2bc66 fix(ivy): NgOnChangesFeature no longer included in hello_world (#28187)
- Wraps the NgOnChangesFeature in a factory such that no side effects occur in the module root
- Adds comments to ngInherit property on feature definition interface to help guide others not to make the same mistake
- Updates compiler to generate the feature properly after the change to it being a factory
- Updates appropriate tests

PR Close #28187
2019-01-23 10:59:34 -08:00
Ben Lesh a95e81978b refactor(ivy): Add newer, smaller NgOnChangesFeature (#28187)
PR Close #28187
2019-01-23 10:59:34 -08:00
Ben Lesh 5552661fd7 refactor(ivy): revert onChanges change back to a feature (#28187)
- adds fixmeIvy annotation to tests that should remain updated so we can resolve those issues in the subsequent commits

PR Close #28187
2019-01-23 10:59:33 -08:00
Pawel Kozlowski cf8770f3cc fix(ivy): don't create TNodes for native projectable nodes (#28275)
Before this commit we were creating a "fake" TNode for each and every
projectable node passed during dynamic component creation. This approach
had several problems:
- the existing TView structure had to be mutated to accomodate new TNodes and
it was very easy to "corrupt" TView / TNode data structures;
- TNodes are not really needed to fully support projectable nodes so we were
creating objects and updating existing data structures for nothing.

This commit changes the approach so we don't create "fake" TNodes for projectable
nodes but instead we process projectable nodes directly in the projection instruction.
As a result we've got less code, less object allocation and - as a bonus - we fix few
bugs where TView / TNode data structures were corrupted when using projectable nodes.

PR Close #28275
2019-01-23 10:56:09 -08:00
Kristiyan Kostadinov ea1b5c100f fix(ivy): not applying camelCased style properties (#28276)
Fixes Ivy not applying properties that are set in camelCase, because it goes through the `CSSStyleDeclaration` API via `setProperty` and `removeProperty` which requires for [the values to be in dash-case](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CSSStyleDeclaration/setProperty).

**Note:** I opted to let the browser normalize the value, rather than convert it to dash-case during compile time, because there are some special cases like browser-prefixed properties where we might not normalize it in-line with the browser.

This PR fixes FW-579.

PR Close #28276
2019-01-22 12:29:14 -08:00
Kara Erickson 058aafcc0c fix(ivy): fix styling context resolution for host bindings on containers (#28221)
Previous to this change, the isStylingContext() function was improperly
returning true for LContainers because it used the presence of an array
at index 2 to determine whether it was a styling context. Unfortunately,
LContainers also contain arrays at index 2, so this would return a false
positive. This led to other errors down the line because we would treat
nodes with containers as if they already had styling contexts (even if
they did not), so the proper initialization logic for styling contexts
was not run.

This commit fixes the isStylingContext() function to use LCONTAINER_LENGTH
as a marker rather than the presence of an array, which in turn fixes
host bindings to styles on nodes with containers.

PR Close #28221
2019-01-22 09:45:16 -08:00