In Ivy, if you do:
`TestBed.configureTestingModule({providers: [{provide: Service}]});`
the injector will attempt to inject Service as if it was simply listed
in the providers array like `{providers: [Service]}`
This fixes an inconsistency when similarly providing an override with no
`useValue` or `useFactory`.
PR Close#33769
Prior to this commit, there was no check in R3TestBed to verify that metadata is resolved using a given Type. That leads to some cryptic error messages (when TestBed tries to compile a Type without having metadata) in case TestBed override functions receive unexpected Types (for example a Directive is used in `TestBed.overrideComponent` call). This commit adds the necessary checks to verify metadata presence before TestBed tries to (re)compile a Type.
PR Close#34204
NgModule compilation in JIT mode (that is also used in TestBed) caches module scopes on NgModule defs (using `transitiveCompileScopes` field). Module overrides (defined via TestBed.overrideModule) may invalidate this data by adding/removing items in `declarations` list. This commit forces TestBed to recalculate transitive scopes in case module overrides are present, so TestBed always gets the most up-to-date information.
PR Close#33787
While overriding providers in Ivy TestBed (via TestBed.overrideProvider call), the old providers were retained in the list, since the override takes precedence. However, presence of providers in the list might have side-effect: if a provider has the `ngOnDestroy` lifecycle hook, this hook will be registered and invoked later (when component is destroyed). This commit updates TestBed logic to clear provider list by removing the ones which have overrides.
PR Close#33706
This issue was found when debugging a test failure that was using lazy
loaded modules with the router. When doing this, the router calls
`NgModuleFactory.create` for the loaded module. This module gets a new
injector so the overrides provided in TestBed are not applied unless the
Injectable is in the providers list (which is not the case for
{providedIn...} Injectables).
PR Close#33606
Injector defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngInjectorDef to inj. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
PR Close#33151
Module defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngModuleDef to mod. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
PR Close#33142
Directive defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngDirectiveDef to dir. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
Note that the other "defs" (ngFactoryDef, etc) will be
prefixed and shortened in follow-up PRs, in an attempt to
limit how large and conflict-y this change is.
PR Close#33110
Component defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
`ngComponentDef` to `cmp`. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
Note that the other "defs" (ngDirectiveDef, etc) will be
prefixed and shortened in follow-up PRs, in an attempt to
limit how large and conflict-y this change is.
PR Close#33088
This PR updates Angular to compile with TypeScript 3.6 while retaining
compatibility with TS3.5. We achieve this by inserting several `as any`
casts for compatiblity around `ts.CompilerHost` APIs.
PR Close#32908
There are a couple scenarios that are problematic and need special
handling:
1. A user has a custom implementation of lazy-loaded modules, sets some
provider overrides, then compiles the module so it can be loaded. In a
follow-up test, the user sets different overrides for the module and
then compiles. This is problematic because we need to be sure the module
registered in the first test is not used, so we need to clear it out of
the modules list in `ng_module_factory_registration`.
2. A user has a similar lazy-loaded module factory implementation but
relies on the module being registered automatically. This can happen,
for example, as a side effect of importing the ngfactory file.
PR Close#32944
Extend the vocabulary of the `providedIn` to also include `'platform'` and `'any'`` scope.
```
@Injectable({
providedId: 'platform', // tree shakable injector for platform injector
})
class MyService {...}
```
PR Close#32154
TestBed.get is not type safe, fixing it would be a massive breaking
change. The Angular team has proposed replacing it with TestBed.inject
and deprecate TestBed.get.
Deprecation from TestBed.get will come as a separate commit.
Issue #26491Fixes#29905
BREAKING CHANGE: Injector.get now accepts abstract classes to return
type-safe values. Previous implementation returned `any` through the
deprecated implementation.
PR Close#32200
As part of FW-1265, the `@angular/core` package is made compatible
with the TypeScript `--strict` flag. This already unveiled a few bugs,
so the strictness flag seems to help with increasing the overall code health.
Read more about the strict flag [here](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/compiler-options.html)
PR Close#30993
Prior to this commit, it was impossible to override providers defined via ModuleWithProviders using TestBed.overrideProvider API. The problem was caused by the fact that we were not taking into account these providers while calculating accumulated set of provider overrides. This commit updates the logic to extract providers from ModuleWithProviders and calculate the final set of overrides taking them into account.
PR Close#31415
Andrew Scott
Andrew Kushnir
JiaLiPassion
Igor Minar
Matias Niemelä
Kara Erickson
Nikita Potapenko
Danny Skoog
Martin Probst
Carlos Ortiz García
Misko Hevery
atscott
Paul Gschwendtner
cexbrayat