Prior to this change we processed binding expression (including bindings with pipes) in i18n attributes before we generate update instruction. As a result, slot offsets for pipeBind instructions were calculated incorrectly. Now we perform binding expression processing when we generate "update block" instructions, so offsets are calculated correctly.
PR Close#30573
Currently the `@angular/compiler-cli` compliance tests sometimes do
not throw an exception if the expected output does not match the
generated JavaScript output. This can happen for the following cases:
1. Expected code includes character that is not part of known alphabet
(e.g. `Δ` is still used in a new compliance test after rebasing a PR)
2. Expected code asserts that a string literal matches a string with
escaped quotes. e.g. expects `const $var$ = "\"quoted\"";`)
PR Close#30597
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
Previously we defensively wrapped expressions in case they ran afoul of
precedence rules. For example, it would be easy to create the TS AST structure
Call(Ternary(a, b, c)), but might result in printed code of:
```
a ? b : c()
```
Whereas the actual structure we meant to generate is:
```
(a ? b : c)()
```
However the TypeScript renderer appears to be clever enough to provide
parenthesis as necessary.
This commit removes these defensive paraenthesis in the cases of binary
and ternary operations.
FW-1273
PR Close#30349
A structural directive can specify a template guard for an input, such that
the type of that input's binding can be narrowed based on the guard's return
type. Previously, such template guards could only be methods, of which an
invocation would be inserted into the type-check block (TCB). For `NgIf`,
the template guard narrowed the type of its expression to be `NonNullable`
using the following declaration:
```typescript
export declare class NgIf {
static ngTemplateGuard_ngIf<E>(dir: NgIf, expr: E): expr is NonNullable<E>
}
```
This works fine for usages such as `*ngIf="person"` but starts to introduce
false-positives when e.g. an explicit non-null check like
`*ngIf="person !== null"` is used, as the method invocation in the TCB
would not have the desired effect of narrowing `person` to become
non-nullable:
```typescript
if (NgIf.ngTemplateGuard_ngIf(directive, ctx.person !== null)) {
// Usages of `ctx.person` within this block would
// not have been narrowed to be non-nullable.
}
```
This commit introduces a new strategy for template guards to allow for the
binding expression itself to be used as template guard in the TCB. Now,
the TCB generated for `*ngIf="person !== null"` would look as follows:
```typescript
if (ctx.person !== null) {
// This time `ctx.person` will successfully have
// been narrowed to be non-nullable.
}
```
This strategy can be activated by declaring the template guard as a
property declaration with `'binding'` as literal return type.
See #30235 for an example where this led to a false positive.
PR Close#30248
Currently in Ivy `NgModule` registration happens when the class is declared, however this is inconsistent with ViewEngine and requires extra generated code. These changes remove the generated code for `registerModuleFactory`, pass the id through to the `ngModuleDef` and do the module registration inside `NgModuleFactory.create`.
This PR resolves FW-1285.
PR Close#30244
```
//packages/compiler-cli/test:ngc
//packages/compiler/test:test
```
This also address `node_modules` to the ignored paths for ngc compiler as otherwise the `ready` is never fired
Partially addresses #29785
PR Close#30146
Now that the dependent files and compilation scopes are being tracked in
the incremental state, we can skip analysing and emitting source files if
none of their dependent files have changed since the last compile.
The computation of what files (and their dependencies) are unchanged is
computed during reconciliation.
This commit also removes the previous emission skipping logic, since this
approach covers those cases already.
PR Close#30238
This is the final patch to migrate the Angular styling code to have a
smaller instruction set in preparation for the runtime refactor. All
styling-related instructions now work both in template and hostBindings
functions and do not use `element` as a prefix for their names:
BEFORE:
elementStyling()
elementStyleProp()
elementClassProp()
elementStyleMap()
elementClassMap()
elementStylingApply()
AFTER:
styling()
styleProp()
classProp()
styleMap()
classMap()
stylingApply()
PR Close#30318
This patch removes all host-specific styling instructions in favor of
using element-level instructions instead. Because of the previous
patches that made sure `select(n)` worked between styling calls, all
host level instructions are not needed anymore. This patch changes each
of those instruction calls to use any of the `elementStyling*`,
`elementStyle*` and `elementClass*` styling instructions instead.
PR Close#30336
This patch is one commit of many patches that will unify all styling instructions
across both template-level bindings and host-level bindings. This patch in particular
removes the `elementIndex` param because it is already set prior to each styling
instruction via the `select(n)` instruction.
PR Close#30313
Prior to this patch, the `select(n)` instruction would only be generated
when property bindings are encountered which meant that styling-related
bindings were skipped. This patch ensures that all styling-related bindings
(i.e. class and style bindings) are always prepended with a `select()`
instruction prior to being generated in AOT.
PR Close#30311
This patch breaks up the existing `elementStylingMap` into
`elementClassMap` and `elementStyleMap` instructions. It also breaks
apart `hostStlyingMap` into `hostClassMap` and `hostStyleMap`
instructions. This change allows for better tree-shaking and reduces
the complexity of the styling algorithm code for `[style]` and `[class]`
bindings.
PR Close#30293
Fixes `HostBinding` and `HostListener` declarations not being inherited from base classes that don't have an Angular decorator.
This PR resolves FW-1275.
PR Close#30158
- Extracts and documents code that will be common to interpolation instructions
- Ensures that binding indices are updated at the proper time during compilation
- Adds additional tests
Related #30011
PR Close#30129
ngtsc generates type constructors which infer the type of a directive based
on its inputs. Previously, a bug existed where this inference would fail in
the case of 'any' input values. For example, the inference of NgForOf fails
when an 'any' is provided, as it causes TypeScript to attempt to solve:
T[] = any
In this case, T gets inferred as {}, the empty object type, which is not
desirable.
The fix is to assign generic types in type constructors a default type of
'any', which TypeScript uses instead of {} when inference fails.
PR Close#30094
ngtsc previously could attempt to reuse the main ts.Program twice. This
occurred when template type-checking was enabled and then an incremental
build was performed. This breaks a TypeScript invariant - ts.Programs can
only be reused once.
The creation of the template type-checking program reuses the main program,
rendering it moot. Then, on the next incremental build the main program
would be subject to reuse again, which would crash inside TypeScript.
This commit fixes the issue by reusing the template type-checking program
from the previous run on the next incremental build. Since under normal
circumstances the files in the type-checking program aren't changed, this
should be just as fast.
Testing strategy: a test is added in the incremental_spec which validates
that program reuse with type-checking turned on does not crash the compiler.
Fixes#30079
PR Close#30090
Fixes view and content queries not being inherited in Ivy, if the base class hasn't been annotated with an Angular decorator (e.g. `Component` or `Directive`).
Also reworks the way the `ngBaseDef` is created so that it is added at the same point as the queries, rather than inside of the `Input` and `Output` decorators.
This PR partially resolves FW-1275. Support for host bindings will be added in a follow-up, because this PR is somewhat large as it is.
PR Close#30015
Prior to this commit, the check that verifies correct "id" field type was too strict and didn't allow `module.id` as @NgModule's "id" field value. This change adds a special handling for `module.id` and uses it as id of @NgModule if specified.
PR Close#30040
The compiler uses metadata to represent what it statically knows about
various expressions in a program. Occasionally, expressions in the program
for which metadata is extracted may contain sub-expressions which are not
representable in metadata. One such construct is an arrow function.
The compiler does not always need to understand such expressions completely.
For example, for a provider defined with `useValue`, the compiler does not
need to understand the value at all, only the outer provider definition. In
this case, the compiler employs a technique known as "expression lowering",
where it rewrites the provider expression into one that can be represented
in metadata. Chiefly, this involves extracting out the dynamic part (the
`useValue` expression) into an exported constant.
Lowering is applied through a heuristic, which considers the containing
statement as well as the field name of the expression.
Previously, this heuristic was not completely accurate in the case of
route definitions and the `loadChildren` field, which is lowered. If the
route definition using `loadChildren` existed inside a decorator invocation,
lowering was performed correctly. However, if it existed inside a standalone
variable declaration with an export keyword, the heuristic would conclude
that lowering was unnecessary. For ordinary providers this is true; however
the compiler attempts to fully understand the ROUTES token and thus even if
an array of routes is declared in an exported variable, any `loadChildren`
expressions within still need to be lowered.
This commit enables lowering of already exported variables under a limited
set of conditions (where the initializer expression is of a specific form).
This should enable the use of `loadChildren` in route definitions.
PR Close#30038
Ben Lesh
Andrew Kushnir
Paul Gschwendtner
janith
Pete Bacon Darwin
JoostK
Alan
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Matias Niemelä
Alex Rickabaugh