Libraries that create components dynamically using component factories,
such as `@angular/upgrade` need to pass blocks of projected content
through to the `ComponentFactory.create()` method. These blocks
are extracted from the content by matching CSS selectors defined in
`<ng-content select="..">` tags found in the component's template.
The Angular compiler collects these CSS selectors when compiling a component's
template, and exposes them via the `ComponentFactory.ngContentSelectors`
property.
This change ensures that this property is filled correctly when the
component factory is created by compiling a component with the Ivy engine.
PR Close#27867
In ngUpgrade (dynamic) we create a dynamic Angular `Directive` that wraps AngularJS components
that are being upgraded. The constructor of this `Directive` class returns a different instance
than `this`. It is this instance that actually contains the life-cycle hook handlers.
This would break in ivy, since the methods on the prototype of the original class are wired up,
rather than the instance methods. This results in hooks like `ngOnInit` not being called.
This commit refactors the code to extend the inner class that was being returned so that the
prototype chain is correct for both ViewEngine and ivy.
This change resolves a number of failing ivy tests, but also exposes other failures that were
masked by this issue. The tests have been updated accordingly.
(FW-812)
PR Close#27660
`NgModule` requires that `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe`s are listed in
declarations, and that each `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe` is declared
in exactly one `NgModule`. This change adds runtime checks to ensure
that these sementics are true at runtime.
There will need to be seperate set of checks for the AoT path of the
codebase to verify that same set of semantics hold. Due to current
design there does not seem to be an easy way to share the two checks
because JIT deal with references where as AoT deals with AST nodes.
PR Close#27604
All errors for existing fields have been detected and suppressed with a
`!` assertion.
Issue/24571 is tracking proper clean up of those instances.
One-line change required in ivy/compilation.ts, because it appears that
the new syntax causes tsickle emitted node to no longer track their
original sourceFiles.
PR Close#24572
Changes would not propagate to a value in downgraded component in case you had two-way binding and listening to a value-change, e.g. [(value)]="value" (value-change)="fetch()"
Closes#22734
PR Close#22772
Previously, when a downgraded component was destroyed in a way that did
not trigger the `$destroy` event on the element (e.g. when a parent
element was removed from the DOM by Angular, not AngularJS), the
`ComponentRef` was not destroyed and unregistered.
This commit fixes it by listening for the `$destroy` event on both the
element and the scope.
Fixes#22392
PR Close#22400
BREAKING CHANGE
It is no longer possible to declare classes in this format.
```
Component({...}).
Class({
constructor: function() {...}
})
```
This format would only work with JIT and with ES5. This mode doesn’t
allow build tools like Webpack to process and optimize the code, which
results in prohibitively large bundles. We are removing this API
because we are trying to ensure that everyone is on the fast path by
default, and it is not possible to get on the fast path using the ES5
DSL. The replacement is to use TypeScript and `@Decorator` format.
```
@Component({...})
class {
constructor() {...}
}
```
Kara Erickson
Ben Lesh
Pete Bacon Darwin
Miško Hevery
George Kalpakas
Jason Bedard
Jason Aden
Rado Kirov
Domas Trijonis
Olivier Combe