mirror of
https://github.com/apache/struts.git
synced 2026-08-05 14:47:09 +00:00
fix typos in README
This commit is contained in:
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ platform into a coherent whole. Our goal is to leverage existing standards by pr
|
||||
enterprise-grade applications that are easy to maintain over time.
|
||||
|
||||
The Apache Struts Project offered two major versions of the Struts framework. Currently we are only maintaining the Struts 2
|
||||
version. It is recommended to upgrade all Struts 1.x application to Struts 2. Please do not start new application development
|
||||
version. It is recommended to upgrade all Struts 1.x applications to Struts 2. Please do not start new application development
|
||||
using Struts 1.x, as we are no longer issuing security patches.
|
||||
|
||||
Struts 2 was originally known as WebWork 2. After working independently for several years, the WebWork and Struts
|
||||
@@ -74,25 +74,25 @@ to difficult problems.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why should you use Apache Struts?
|
||||
|
||||
Apache Struts is a modern, maintained and full-featured web framework. It has been there for years and give the huge user
|
||||
base it is unlikely it will go away anytime soon in the future. Not only that we have dedicated users and developers
|
||||
on the project. Apache Struts is licensed to the Apache License 2.0 and this will not change. We maintain a clean IP
|
||||
Apache Struts is a modern, maintained and full-featured web framework. It has been there for years and given the huge user
|
||||
base it is unlikely it will go away anytime soon. Not only that, we have dedicated users and developers
|
||||
on the project. Apache Struts is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 and this will not change. We maintain a clean IP
|
||||
and you are “safe” to use the project. Sometimes you are not “safe” to use a project when a company controls the SCM.
|
||||
Access to Source Code doesn’t mean it is free. With Apache Struts, you are not only free to “do what you want with it”,
|
||||
you can even contribute (which is not always the case). And best of it: you can become a part of the core team too.
|
||||
you can even contribute (which is not always the case). And best of all: you can become a part of the core team too.
|
||||
|
||||
It is usually very easy to integrate other technologies with Apache Struts. If you are using an ORM like Apache Cayenne,
|
||||
Hibernate or JDBC you will not have any restrictions. Apache Struts is not even tied too much to a frontend technology.
|
||||
Hibernate or JDBC, you will not have any restrictions. Apache Struts is not even tied too much to a frontend technology.
|
||||
In old days it was JSP, then came Velocity and Freemarker. Nowadays you might build your web application with just static
|
||||
HTML and AngularJS. Or you want to use Sitemesh or Tiles. This all is no problem due to Struts elegant and easy to use
|
||||
HTML and AngularJS. Or you might want to use Sitemesh or Tiles. This all is no problem due to Struts' elegant and easy-to-use
|
||||
extension mechanisms.
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike other, component oriented frameworks, we do not aim to hide the stateless nature of the web. We think it is
|
||||
Unlike other, component-oriented frameworks, we do not aim to hide the stateless nature of the web. We think it is
|
||||
perfectly acceptable to build upon a Request/Response cycle. We also think the MVC pattern is not so bad, just because
|
||||
it is old. In fact, we believe the Apache Struts architecture is clean and easy to understand.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, if you wish to build components on the server side which render on the front end side, you are most likely
|
||||
wrong with Struts. This is a different approach which promises to reduce the amount of HTML/JavaScript knowledge needed
|
||||
Of course, if you wish to build components on the server side which render on the front end side, you will most likely
|
||||
not want Struts. This is a different approach which promises to reduce the amount of HTML/JavaScript knowledge needed
|
||||
and to create reusable components for the view layer. Projects like Wicket and Tapestry serve this purpose very well.
|
||||
As with every framework you need to decide if it makes sense for you to build components or if you are better with
|
||||
the Struts-approach.
|
||||
As with every framework, you need to decide if it makes sense for you to build components or if you prefer
|
||||
the Struts approach.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user