We used to ignore empty strings for optimization purposes, but it turns out that empty strings are also valid values for ICU cases and we shouldn't ignore those.
FW-1290 #resolve
PR Close#30846
When an `ng-template` element has a variable declaration without a value,
it is assigned the value of the `$implicit` property in the embedded view's
context. The template compiler inserts a property access to `$implicit` for
template variables without a value, however the type-check code generation
logic did not. This resulted in incorrect type-checking code being generated.
Fixes FW-1326
PR Close#30675
Some HTML attributes don't correspond to their DOM property name, in which
case the runtime will apply the appropriate transformation when assigning
a property using its attribute name. One example of this is the `for`
attribute, for which the DOM property is named `htmlFor`.
The type-checking machinery in ngtsc must also take this mapping into
account, as it generates type-check code in which unclaimed property bindings
are assigned to properties of (subtypes of) `HTMLElement`.
Fixes#30607
Fixes FW-1327
PR Close#30675
Before this change we would systematically call LQueries.clone() when executting
elementStart / elementContainerStart instructions. This was often unnecessary as
LQueries can be mutated under 2 conditions only:
- we are crossing an element that has directives with content queries
(new queries must be added);
- we are descending into element hierarchy (creating a child element of an existing element)
and the current LQueries object is tracking shallow queries (shallow queries are removed).
With this PR LQueires.clone() is only done when needed and this gratelly reduces number
of LQueries object created: in the "expanding rows" benchmark number of allocated
(and often GCed just after!) LQueries is reduced from ~100k -> ~35k. This represents
over 1MB of memory that is not allocated.
PR Close#30664
Projecting bare ICU expressions failed because we would assume that component's content nodes would be projected later and doing so at that point would be wasteful. But ICU nodes are handled independently and should be inserted immediately because they will be ignored by projections.
FW-1348 #resolve
PR Close#30696
"app" is the default prefix for CLI projects when generating components.
This updates our examples to conform that that default
Closes#19778
PR Close#30789
In View Engine, NgModule factories are created for each NgModule and loaded when the module is requested. Ivy doesn't generate the
factories by design and only loads the module class, so it must be compiled after being loaded.
PR Close#30704
Inside of `DebugNode.queryAll` we walk through all of the descendants of the node that we're querying against, however the logic that walks sideways through a node siblings also applies to the root node. This means that eventually we'll match against its nodes as well which will give us invalid results. These changes add an extra check to ensure that we aren't matching against the siblings of the root node.
This PR resolves FW-1353.
PR Close#30788
With View engine it was possible to declare multiple projection
definitions and to programmatically project nodes into the slots.
e.g.
```html
<ng-content></ng-content>
<ng-content></ng-content>
```
Using `ViewContainerRef#createComponent` allowed projecting
nodes into one of the projection defs (through index)
This no longer works with Ivy as the `projectionDef` instruction only
retrieves a list of selectors instead of also retrieving entries for
reserved projection slots which appear when using the default
selector multiple times (as seen above).
In order to fix this issue, the Ivy compiler now passes all
projection slots to the `projectionDef` instruction. Meaning that
there can be multiple projection slots with the same wildcard
selector. This allows multi-slot projection as seen in the
example above, and it also allows us to match the multi-slot node
projection order from View Engine (to avoid breaking changes).
It basically ensures that Ivy fully matches the View Engine behavior
except of a very small edge case that has already been discussed
in FW-886 (with the conclusion of working as intended).
Read more here: https://hackmd.io/s/Sy2kQlgTE
PR Close#30561
Currently with Ivy, `ModuleWithProvider` providers are processed in order
of declaration in the `NgModule` imports. This technically makes makes
sense but is a potential breaking change as `ModuleWithProvider` providers
are processed after all imported modules in View Engine.
In order to keep the behavior of View Engine, the `r3_injector` is updated
to no longer process `ModuleWithProvider` providers egarly.
Resolves FW-1349
PR Close#30688
Lars Gyrup Brink Nielsen
Olivier Combe
George Kalpakas
Bowen Ni
Miško Hevery
JoostK
Brandon
Pandiyan Murugan
Pawel Kozlowski
Sergey Volynkin
Bruno João
Umberto Tarantino
Ben Lesh
Vikram Subramanian
Tim Deschryver
Michael Head
crisbeto
Santosh Yadav
Paul Gschwendtner
hugoer