Message ID computation makes extensive use of big integer
multiplications in order to translate the message's fingerprint into
a numerical representation. In large compilations with heavy use of i18n
this was showing up high in profiler sessions.
There are two factors contributing to the bottleneck:
1. a suboptimal big integer representation using strings, which requires
repeated allocation and conversion from a character to numeric digits
and back.
2. repeated computation of the necessary base-256 exponents and their
multiplication factors.
The first bottleneck is addressed using a representation that uses an
array of individual digits. This avoids repeated conversion and
allocation overhead is also greatly reduced, as adding two big integers
can now be done in-place with virtually no memory allocations.
The second point is addressed by a memoized exponentiation pool to
optimize the multiplication of a base-256 exponent.
As an additional optimization are the two 32-bit words now converted to
decimal per word, instead of going through an intermediate byte buffer
and doing the decimal conversion per byte.
The results of these optimizations depend a lot on the number of i18n
messages for which a message should be computed. Benchmarks have shown
that computing message IDs is now ~6x faster for 1,000 messages, ~14x
faster for 10,000 messages, and ~24x faster for 100,000 messages.
PR Close#39694
Currently when we encounter an implicit method call (e.g. `{{ foo(1) }}`) and we manage to resolve
its receiver to something within the template, we assume that the method is on the receiver itself
so we generate a type checking code to reflect it. This assumption is true in most cases, but it
breaks down if the call is on an implicit receiver and the receiver itself is being invoked. E.g.
```
<div *ngFor="let fn of functions">{{ fn(1) }}</div>
```
These changes resolve the issue by generating a regular function call if the method call's receiver
is pointing to `$implicit`.
Fixes#39634.
PR Close#39686
In order to more accurately map from a node in the TCB to a template position,
we need to provide more span information in the TCB. These changes are necessary
for the Language Service to map from a TCB node back to a specific
locations in the template for actions like "find references" and
"refactor/rename". After the TS "find references" returns results,
including those in the TCB, we need to map specifically to the matching
key/value spans in the template rather than the entire source span.
This also has the benefit of producing diagnostics which align more
closely with what TypeScript produces.
The following example shows TS code and the diagnostic produced by an invalid assignment to a property:
```
let a: {age: number} = {} as any;
a.age = 'laksjdf';
^^^^^ <-- Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'number'.
```
A corollary to this in a template file would be [age]="'someString'". The diagnostic we currently produce for this is:
```
Type 'number' is not assignable to type 'string'.
1 <app-hello [greeting]="1"></app-hello>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Notice that the underlined text includes the entire span.
If we included the keySpan for the assignment to the property,
this diagnostic underline would be more similar to the one produced by TypeScript;
that is, it would only underline “greeting”.
[design/discussion doc]
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FtaHdVL805wKe4E6FxVTnVHl38lICoHIjS2nThtRJ6I/edit?usp=sharing)
PR Close#39665
This commit removes the TODO comment that proposed
that we use the built-in RxJS `isObservable()` function.
This is not a viable approach since the built-in function
requires that the `obj` contains additional methods that
our "observable" types (such as `EventEmitter`) do not
necessarily have.
See #39643 for more information.
PR Close#39669
`ViewRef` and `ApplicationRef` had a circular reference. This change
introduces `ViewRefTracker` which is a subset of `ApplicationRef` for
this purpose.
PR Close#39621
JIT needs to identify which type is `ChangeDetectorRef`. It was doing so
by importing `ChangeDetectorRef` and than comparing the types. This creates
circular dependency as well as prevents tree shaking. The new solution is
to brand the class with `__ChangeDetectorRef__` so that it can be identified
without creating circular dependency.
PR Close#39621
`LContainer` stores `ViewRef`s this is not quite right as it creates
circular dependency between the two types. Also `LContainer` should not
be aware of `ViewRef` which iv ViewEngine specific construct.
PR Close#39621
Due to historical reasons `Injector.__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` was set to `-1`.
This changes it to be consistent with other `*Ref.__NG_ELEMENT_ID__`
constructs.
PR Close#39621
`Renderer2` is declared in ViewEngine but it sub-classed in Ivy. This creates a circular
dependency between ViewEngine `Renderer2` which needs to declare `__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` and
ivy factory which needs to create it. The workaround used to be to pass the `Renderer2`
through stack but that created a very convoluted code. This refactoring simply bundles the
two files together and removes the stack workaround making the code simpler to follow.
PR Close#39621
`ChangeDetectorRef` is declared in ViewEngine but it sub-classed in Ivy. This creates a circular
dependency between ViewEngine `ChangeDetectorRef` which needs to declare `__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` and
ivy factory which needs to create it. The workaround used to be to pass the `ChangeDetectorRef`
through stack but that created a very convoluted code. This refactoring simply bundles the
two files together and removes the stack workaround making the code simpler to follow.
PR Close#39621
`ViewContainerRef` is declared in ViewEngine but it sub-classed in Ivy. This creates a circular
dependency between ViewEngine `ViewContainerRef` which needs to declare `__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` and
ivy factory which needs to create it. The workaround used to be to pass the `ViewContainerRef`
through stack but that created a very convoluted code. This refactoring simply bundles the
two files together and removes the stack workaround making the code simpler to follow.
PR Close#39621
`TemplateRef` is declared in ViewEngine but it sub-classed in Ivy. This creates a circular
dependency between ViewEngine `TemplateRef` which needs to declare `__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` and
ivy factory which needs to create it. The workaround used to be to pass the `TemplateRef`
through stack but that created a very convoluted code. This refactoring simply bundles the
two files together and removes the stack workaround making the code simpler to follow.
PR Close#39621
`ElementRef` is declared in ViewEngine but it sub-classed in Ivy. This creates a circular
dependency between ViewEngine `ElementRef` which needs to declare `__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` and
ivy factory which needs to create it. The workaround used to be to pass the `ElementRef`
through stack but that created a very convoluted code. This refactoring simply bundles the
two files together and removes the stack workaround making the code simpler to follow.
PR Close#39621
Close#39348
Now `NgZone` has an option `shouldCoalesceEventChangeDetection` to coalesce
multiple event handler's change detections to one async change detection.
And there are some cases other than `event handler` have the same issues.
In #39348, the case like this.
```
// This code results in one change detection occurring per
// ngZone.run() call. This is entirely feasible, and can be a serious
// performance issue.
for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
this.ngZone.run(() => {
// do something
});
}
```
So such kind of case will trigger multiple change detections.
And now with Ivy, we have a new `markDirty()` API will schedule
a requestAnimationFrame to trigger change detection and also coalesce
the change detections in the same event loop, `markDirty()` API doesn't
only take care `event handler` but also all other cases `sync/macroTask/..`
So this PR add a new option to coalesce change detections for all cases.
test(core): add test case for shouldCoalesceEventChangeDetection option
Add new test cases for current `shouldCoalesceEventChangeDetection` in `ng_zone.spec`, since
currently we only have integration test for this one.
PR Close#39422
With the update to our labeling scheme across the repository, the L2 triage
labels for PRs needs to be updated to no longer require a label type which
doesn't exist: `type: *`
PR Close#39655
`setComponentScope` was previously undocumented. This commit adds a short
explanation of what the function does, and adds a link to a doc which
explains issues with cycles in more detail.
PR Close#39662
ngtsc will avoid emitting generated imports that would create an import
cycle in the user's program. The main way such imports can arise is when
a component would ordinarily reference its dependencies in its component
definition `directiveDefs` and `pipeDefs`. This requires adding imports,
which run the risk of creating a cycle.
When ngtsc detects that adding such an import would cause this to occur, it
instead falls back on a strategy called "remote scoping", where a side-
effectful call to `setComponentScope` in the component's NgModule file is
used to patch `directiveDefs` and `pipeDefs` onto the component. Since the
NgModule file already imports all of the component's dependencies (to
declare them in the NgModule), this approach does not risk adding a cycle.
It has several large downsides, however:
1. it breaks under `sideEffects: false` logic in bundlers including the CLI
2. it breaks tree-shaking for the given component and its dependencies
See this doc for further details: https://hackmd.io/Odw80D0pR6yfsOjg_7XCJg?view
In particular, the impact on tree-shaking was exacerbated by the naive logic
ngtsc used to employ here. When this feature was implemented, at the time of
generating the side-effectful `setComponentScope` call, the compiler did not
know which of the component's declared dependencies were actually used in
its template. This meant that unlike the generation of `directiveDefs` in
the component definition itself, `setComponentScope` calls had to list the
_entire_ compilation scope of the component's NgModule, including directives
and pipes which were not actually used in the template. This made the tree-
shaking impact much worse, since if the component's NgModule made use of any
shared NgModules (e.g. `CommonModule`), every declaration therein would
become un-treeshakable.
Today, ngtsc does have the information on which directives/pipes are
actually used in the template, but this was not being used during the remote
scoping operation. This commit modifies remote scoping to take advantage of
the extra context and only list used dependencies in `setComponentScope`
calls, which should ameliorate the tree-shaking impact somewhat.
PR Close#39662
This commit adds bazel rules to test whether linking the golden partial
files for test cases produces the same output as a full compile of the
test case would.
PR Close#39617
This commit contains the basic runner logic and a couple of sample test cases
for the "full compile" compliance tests, where source files are compiled
to full definitions and checked against expectations.
PR Close#39617
This commit renames the original `compliance` test directory to `compliance_old`.
Eventually this directory will be deleted once all the tests have been
migrated to the new test case based compliance tests.
PR Close#39617
JoostK
Andrew Scott
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Pete Bacon Darwin
Misko Hevery
Marcono1234
JiaLiPassion
Joey Perrott
Alex Rickabaugh
Kapunahele Wong